A blog post

What Millennial Marketers Can Learn from A Corset Maker

Posted on the 26 July, 2010 at 4:26 pm Written by in Blog, Gen Y Trends, Millennial Brands, Millennial Marketing, Millennial Values

Was the Featherbone Parlor a forerunner of NikeTown and the Apple Store?

There’s a myth that Millennials don’t like marketing and are indifferent to brands.

The reality is, as my friend Rishad Tobaccowala reminded me last week, that Millennials are ‘besotted with brands‘.  While that may seem like a strong choice of words, he isn’t far off the mark. It’s easy to engage a Millennial in a conversation about brands.  They love to talk about what their favorite brands are doing, as the buzz about Old Spice Guy and Nike’s World Cup marketing attests.  They understand the ‘language’ of brands and the role they play in communicating about culture. And many choose to friend or follow their favorite brands in social media so they can stay up to date on the latest news or provide their feedback. Insider information about brands is strong social currency.

What Millennials actually dislike is interruptive advertising.

This is traditional advertising that is designed to appear everywhere and anywhere, irregardless of context, without personalization, with the single goal of gaining awareness and conveying an idea that may or may not have any relevance to the person seeing it at the moment.  This type of advertising is becoming less and less effective because Gen Y (and others) don’t see any reason why they should put up with it and — and don’t.

As marketers look for new ways to engage empowered consumers, ironically they are returning to the origins of marketing.  Marketers are finding ways to add value that may have nothing to do with purchase, but everything to do with making consumer’s lives more informed, more interesting, or more convenient. This is marketing that aims to get noticed, even engaged with, by promising that the marketing itself will improve consumers’ lives.

The book having the greatest impact on my thinking at present is Bob Gilbreath’s, The Next Evolution of Marketing: Marketing with Meaning. Gilbreath points out that there’s nothing new about thinking about brands as offering real service and real value independent of purchase. He points out that David Ogilvy’s first ad for Guinness was a reference guide to selecting oysters. The 100-year-old Michelin guide was originally a travel guide for car owners in France ‘complete with information about auto maintenance, lodging, restrooms, and restaurants’ that created awareness for its tires and emboldened consumers to take to the roads.  Betty Crocker cook books helped consumers try new recipes and gave them confidence in the kitchen.

Gilbreath believes that the answer to today’s challenge of consumer avoidance of ‘interruptive’ marketing tactics is to return to meaningful approaches like these  that connect brands more directly to their target audiences.

I think he’s right. We could learn from these old school marketers. Here’s another example, dating back to the 1880’s. Warren Featherstone was the inventor of the ‘featherbone stay’, a replacement for whalebone stays in corsets created from by-products from the manufacture of feather dusters. Featherstone knew a thing or two about branded utility and community building.

“Featherbone Parlors were established in major cities and fashion shows were held to demonstrate the latest uses of featherbone to customers. With changing fashion styles, Warren kept adding new products and promotional campaigns. Featherbone bustles, bust extenders, featherbone-stiffened fabric, different weights and widths of feather bones, collar and belt foundations were among the new features offered. Promotions included instruction booklets and in 1893 Warren began publishing the Featherbone Magazinette for distribution to dressmakers and retailers plus advertisements in Ladies Home Journal and other women’s magazines. To further reach the home market and dressmaker, Warren patented and market a featherboning attachment for the home sewing machine in 1895. This 3-1/8″ long attachment mounted on the bed of the sewing machine and aided in the insertion of featherbone or stay.” – http://www.fabrics.net/joan905.asp

Think of the ‘featherboning attachment’ as an app and the ‘Featherbone Parlor’ as a 19th Century Apple Store, you can see just how far, or little, we’ve come from those early days.  But there’s more. Warren Featherbone also understood the power of philanthropy. In 1917 he “acted on his vision to help create a better world for future generations by establishing the Warren Featherbone Foundation.” The foundation was intended to establish new methods for everyday people to engage in philanthropy. and led directly to the donation of properties for parklands and wilderness areas in the State of Michigan, known as Warren Dunes State Park and Warren Woods.

As we move from an interruptive model to an engagement model for marketing and brand building, brand strategies will also need to evolve, and perhaps what was old will be new again.

Marketers are investigating the power of  ’branded utility’, ‘community building’, ‘user generated content’ and new forms of ’cause marketing’ as means for adding value and meaning to their brands.

We may look back and see the ‘Mad Men’ era of mass media as the exception, not the rule in the evolution of marketing.

For some great examples of campaigns that made participation the goal, see “Five Fantastic  Campaigns that Put Digital First” by Jim Nichols of Catalyst.

  • http://itsjosipnotjoseph.com/ Josip

    Another great article Carol! And I couldn't agree more. Being a Millennial/Gen-Y myself, there is nothing more annoying than being interrupted by an ad. Even more so when you're online at you land on to a page where your are forced to watch the ad before continuing to what you came to the page for.

    However, a sense of engagement goes a long way. It's been something I've blogged about myself and am a firm believer in. The most successful brands show glimpses of this and some more than others. With that being said, engagement not only delivers value to that brand it brings value to the customer.

  • Dvilleoysters

    The best chesapeake bay oysters are grown on our family farm

    Quality & Sustainability
    http://www.deltavilleoystercompany.com

  • http://twitter.com/ravin_dave Ravin Dave

    Agreed!! I spend quite a bit of time these days riding public
    transportation. As a result I have the opportunity to “engage” with many people. At the simplest level, others may acknowledge my existence and maybe even read whatever message is on my graphic tee shirt. That I consider an impression. But beyond the random impressions that may facilitate a conversation, it takes much more to tee up a conversation, let alone an engagement.

    That said I enjoy conversing with random people. But what if the people I sit next too are already engaged in a conversation or something other than me? I start to consider the ways I can break into the conversation or at least in to their consideration so I can eventually get into a conversation if that's my objective.

    In the traditional world of marketing I might try using a swift headline or pickup line. Or if the opportunity didn't present itself, I could just blurt out what it was I wanted to say. And if they still didn't engage, I'd sit there and repeat my message over and over until I got some sort of reaction. This is the interruptive model. Sure after that reaction, I may become part of a memorable story retold to others later on, but I'm quite sure it
    wouldn't be in positive light.

    The reality is, that most people we come across are very focused and entrenched in their own worlds. Not until they need something do they look outside of their worlds. I believe I have a lot to offer others in their worlds. However, if I just blurt out what it is I think, chances are they won't be overly receptive. This is why I listen to the conversation first, wait for the right moment and then add value to the context.

    The other day a group of four millennials sat next to me in the train. We all a good group laugh about something happening outside of the train, but that superficial rapport was not enough to let me into their deeper conversation. I needed another reason for them to give me the time of day. After me asking a number of questions the guy in the
    group finally asked what it was that I do?

    I told him that like the movie inception, I make ideas. He hadn't seen the movie yet, but asked me to give him an example of an idea as he struggled to open a banana..

    I replied certainly, then asked if I could share with him an alternative idea on how to open the banana. Confused, he answered “sure..” I then took the banana, flipped it upside down, pinched the nub and easily peeled back the skin.

    “Wow” he exclaimed.. “Thats a crazy idea..and it works better then the
    one I've always used..” after this engagement he actually really
    wanted to know what it was I did.

    Prior to that engagement, he was soley asking to be polite since i asked him so many questions.. And even then, it took 20 mins of semi-active particiaption on my part to get any sort of acknowledgement.

    Point is that I I had not engaged, and had just thrown my message out there is a good chance that it would not have been received and had any impact.

    Imagine if I told him how to peel a banana before he had thought about peeling the banana. By the time he peeled he maybe would have forgotten what I said or just decided to do it his own way instead. From a reach standpoint I would have made an impression, but from an action standpoint my message wouldn't have been as effective and the good idea would be lost in translation or reception.

    That's because the time and place of the message as well the delivery – while interruptive – would have been dissruptive and my new approach to peeling a banana may not have been enough to trigger a future action. It definitely would not have helped my objective in engaging in a conversation beyond peeling bananas when he wasn't even thinking about bananas..

    Marketing ideas are no different. Not only do ideas and messages need to be the right message at the right time, but they need to be delivered in the right way for the right audience if they are going to have an impact and cause action.

    While content may be king, and marketing may be queen – context is the joker that can steal the crown.

    Engagement is key to keeping the crown safe.

    Boo interruptive marketing.. Hooray engagement marketing!!

    RD

  • Pingback: Why Interruptive Advertising Doesn’t Work | Millennial Marketing